Taxpayer can seek legal fees at Tax Court. A taxpayer has the right to request from the Tax Court an award of attorney fees and costs spent in successful tax appeals against the IRS. See 26 U.S.C. § 7430(a). However, there are multiple prerequisites that the taxpayer must meet before being entitled to an award of legal fees. If the taxpayer fails to strictly follow the prerequisites, the Tax Court will deny legal fees. As a practical matter, it is difficult for the taxpayer to receive legal fees.
Taxpayer must exhaust administrative remedies. One foundational prerequisite to recovering legal fees is the obligation to exhaust administrative remedies.[1] In basic terms, this means that the taxpayer must follow all administrative steps available to resolve the tax prior to filing a petition with the Tax Court to contest the tax.
At the conclusion of an audit, the IRS will inform the taxpayer of a proposed audit adjustment along with the taxpayer’s ability to review the matter with the auditor and appeal the audit determination to the office of IRS Independent Appeals. IRS Appeals serves as a way to avoid the logjam and litigation-heavy processes of Tax Court. A high percentage of tax appeals are resolved at IRS Appeals. It is usually in the best interest of the taxpayer and the government to see if the case can be resolved at IRS Appeals before litigating in Tax Court. However, the Taxpayer does not have to go to IRS Appeals. If the Taxpayer does not timely elect to refer the case to Appeals, the IRS will issue the statutory Notice of Deficiency, also called the 90-day letter, and give the taxpayer the right to challenge the tax assessment in Tax Court.
Taxpayer denied legal fees when skipping IRS Appeals. In Veal-Hill v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,[2] the taxpayer did not appeal to IRS Appeals when it had the opportunity to do so. So after the 90-day letter, the taxpayer filed a petition in Tax Court to challenge the tax. At that time, the IRS referred the case to IRS Appeals, which is the common practice after a case is filed in Tax Court and the matter had not previously been to Appeals. At Appeals, the taxpayer demonstrated that it was substantially correct in its tax position and the assessment was lowered from $84,000 down to $500. This is a nice victory for the taxpayer.
Despite an overwhelmingly favorable result to the taxpayer, the Tax Court and Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied the taxpayer’s request for legal fees. The reason: failure to exhaust administrative remedies because the taxpayers did not take the case to IRS appeal before filing a petition in Tax Court. The Seventh Circuit stated the law:
For matters in which a conference with the IRS Office of Appeals is available to resolve disputes, a party exhausts administrative remedies only by (1) participating in a conference ‘prior to filing a petition in the Tax Court’, or (2) requesting a conference, even if none is granted, ‘prior to the issuance of a statutory notice [of deficiency].’ 26 C.F.R. § 301.7430-1(b).[3]
Practice Point. The taxpayer who believes that he or she has a good case against the IRS wherein legal fees may be awarded must make sure to request a conference with IRS Appeals. Otherwise, the taxpayer will fail to exhaust administrative remedies and lose the ability to recover legal fees even if prevailing against the IRS and lowering the income tax assessment by 99%.
I typically advise taxpayers that we can determine during the course of litigation if we may be in a good position to recover legal fees at the end; however, the taxpayer should not count on recovering legal fees as part of the tax appeal. I do not undertake representation if the source of the payment of my legal fees will be recovering the fees from the IRS.
About the Author. Jared M. Le Fevre is a Partner in the Tax, Trusts and Estates Practice Group of Crowley Fleck PLLP. Mr. Le Fevre represents taxpayers before the IRS, IRS Independent Office of Appeals, US Tax Court, Federal District Court and state tax agencies throughout Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, Idaho, and Utah. Mr. Le Fevre is involved in federal and state and local tax audits, appeals, and tax resolution throughout these western states. Mr. Le Fevre also advises clients on the tax effects of business and real estate transactions.
Information current as of June 28, 2022.
Disclaimers:
-
- This is not legal advice: The information provided herein is for general informational purposes only and does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. While we attempt to ensure that the information contained on this website has been obtained from reliable sources, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any results obtained from the use of this information. All information on this website is provided “as is” and has no guarantee of completeness, timeliness, or accuracy. No one should take action in reliance on the information contained on this website and we disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this site to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any links to other third-party websites are only for the convenience of the reader and we do not recommend or endorse the contents of such sites.
- Seek competent representation: Due to the often-complex nature of tax issues, we recommend anyone with questions about a particular legal matter seek competent legal and financial representation. Nothing on this website is an offer to represent you, and the use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources which may be contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Crowley Fleck, PLLP, or any of its attorneys. The content of any unsolicited communications sent to Crowley Fleck, PLLP, or to any of its attorneys, will not create an attorney‑client relationship and the contents of such unsolicited communication shall not be considered confidential.
- The views expressed are individual: The views expressed on, or through, this site are those of the individual authors writing in their individual capacities only – not those of Crowley Fleck, PLLP.
- No advertisement or solicitation: This website is not intended as advertising or as solicitation for legal services.
- No client information: The information herein does not contain confidential or otherwise private information about current or former clients of Crowley Fleck, PLLP and any similarities between hypothetical situations presented herein and current or former client circumstances is purely coincidental.
[1] 26 U.S.C. § 7430(b).
[2] Veal-Hill v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, –Fed.Appx.—, 2020 WL 4208459, at *2 (7th Cir. July 22, 2020).
[3] Veal-Hill, 2020 WL 4208459, at *2.